Relationship between the Responsiveness of Service Providers with Patient Satisfaction at Three Conventional Radiography Services in Denpasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53638/phpma.2016.v4.i1.p11Keywords:
patient satisfaction, responsiveness, conventional radiography servicesAbstract
Background and purpose: Patient satisfaction, including on radiography services, is an important component of health care provision. Surveys on patient satisfaction have been carried out particularly in government hospitals, but a more detailed study to determine the relationship between patient satisfaction with the responsiveness of service providers has yet to be carried out. This study aims to determine the relationship between the six domains of responsiveness of service providers and outpatient satisfaction at three conventional radiography facilities in Denpasar.
Methods: Study was conducted by cross-sectional survey of 158 respondents selected consecutively in three conventional radiography services, namely a government hospital, a private hospital and a private radiology clinic. Data were collected through interviews using modified questionnaires on responsiveness from WHO. Data were analyzed by univariate, bivariate (chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression method.
Results: Univariate analysis indicated that patient satisfaction was 69% but still below the minimum service standards (>80,0%). Multivariate analysis showed that factors associated with satisfaction were the domain of attention (AOR=3.77; 95%CI: 1.62-8.76), the quality of infrastructure (AOR=4.57; 95%CI: 1.61-12.93) and communication (AOR=6.30; 95%CI: 1.75-22.64).
Conclusion: Patient satisfaction was generally still below the standard. Domains of responsiveness associated with patient satisfaction were the quality of infrastructure, level of attention and communication skills of service providers.
References
Ofir, C. & Simonson, I. In Search of Negative Customer Feedback: The Effect of Expecting to Evaluate on Satisfaction Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research; 200;, 38(2):170–182.
Szysmanski, D.M. & Henard, D.H. Customer Satisfaction : A Meta-Analysis of The Empirical Evidence. Journal of The Academy of Markerting Science; 2001; 29(1):16–35.
Khunwuthikorn, K. A Comparative Study of Service Quality and Outpatient Satisfaction between Public and Private Hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand. BANGKOK UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CONFERENCE; 2011; 378–391.
Kincey, J., Bradshaw, P. & Ley, P. Patients’ satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice. The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners,; 1975; 25(157):558–66.
Ware, J.E. et al. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Evaluation and program planning; 1983; 6(3-4):247–263.
Wong, E.L.Y. et al. A population-based survey using PPE-15: relationship of care aspects to patient satisfaction in Hong Kong. International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua; 2011; 23(4):390–396.
Bleich, S.N., Özaltin, E. & Murray, C.J. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization; 2009; 87(4):271–278.
Naseer, M. Determinants of patient ’ s satisfaction with health care system in Pakistan : a critical review. , 2(June) ; 2012
Nurhayati. Faktor Responsiveness terhadap Kepuasan Pasien di Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak (KIA). Jurnal Health Quality V, Vol. 4(No. 2), p.Hal. 77 – 141 ; 2014
Arief, T. Jumlah Rumah Sakit Umum Diprediksi Tumbuh 10% Tahun Depan. Bisnis Indonesia, p.Front Page ; 2014Available at: RS/Jumlah Rumah Sakit Umum Diprediksi Tumbuh 10% Tahun Depan Industri-Bisnis.com.html. (Diakses 19 Januari 2015)
Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi. Distribusi Rumah Sakit Kabupaten dan Kota Di Bali, Provinsi Bali;2012
Direktorat Jenderal Bina Upaya Kesehatan. Rumah Sakit Pemerintah dan Swasta Di Indonesia, Jakarta;2014
Naradipa, D.A.M. Dilema RS Swasta di Era JKN. Pos Bali; 2014.
Padma, P., Rajendran, C., & Prakash, S.L. A conceptual framework of service quality in healthcare: A conceptual framework of service quality in healthcare: Benchmarking: An International Journal: Vol 16, No 2. International Journal; 2009; 16(2):157–191.
Parra, S.O., Erturk, S.M. & Ros, P.R. Survey of the Use of Quality Indicators In Academic Radiology Departments. AJR, (November); 2006;451–455.
Jenkinson, C. & Coulter, A. Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Quality and Safety; 2002.
Alderson, P.O. Noninterpretive Skills for Customer Service and Satisfaction in Radiology, (August), pp.319–323; 2000
Tjiptono, F. Pemasaran Jasa-Prinsip, Penerapan dan Penelitian Ed.I., Yogjakarta: Andi Yogjakarta; 2014
Unit Penjamin Mutu Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Wangaya Kota Denpasar. Evaluasi Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Wangaya Kota Denpasar Tahun ; 2014
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomer 129 Tahun 2008 tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Rumah Sakit; 2008
Arianto. Komunikasi Kesehatan (Komunikasi Antara Dokter Dan Pasien). , pp.1–13; 2000
Salazar, G., Quencer, K. & Aran, S. Patient Satisfaction in Radiology: A Qualitative Analysis | RadVoice. Journal of the American College of Radiology; 2013; 10(07:513–517.
Basu, P.A. et al. Creating a Patient-Centered Imaging Service: Determining What Patients Want. AJR, 196(March), pp.20–25; 2011
Beach, M.C. & Duggan, P.S. Receipt of Preventive Care ? Annals Of Family Medicine; 2005; 03(4):331–338.
Joffe, S., Manocchia, M.,Weeks, P.D.C. What do patients value in their hospital care ? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics. J Med Ethics; 2003; 103–108.
Sankar, P. et al. Patient Perspectives on Medical Confidentiality. J Gen Intern Med, 18(Agustus); 2003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cokorda Istri Ariwidyastuti, Pande Putu Januraga, Dyah Pradnyaparamita Duarsa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
**Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)**
*Welcome to the world of open collaboration and shared creativity! The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) empowers creators to share their work with the world while maintaining certain rights.*
**Key Points:**
1. **Freedom to Share:** CC BY 4.0 allows creators to share their work globally, granting others the freedom to use, remix, and build upon it.
2. **Attribution Requirement:** Users can use the work for any purpose, even commercially, as long as they provide appropriate credit to the original creator.
3. **Flexibility:** Applicable to various content types—text, images, music, videos—the license fosters a diverse range of creations.
**Common Use Cases:**
- **Education:** Widely used for educational materials, promoting open learning environments.
- **Research:** Applied to scholarly articles, accelerating the dissemination of knowledge.
**How to Use:**
1. **Share:** Share your work with the world, marking it with the CC BY 4.0 license.
2. **Attribution:** Users, when utilizing the work, must provide proper attribution to honor the original creator.
**Conclusion:**
CC BY 4.0 contributes to a more open and collaborative digital landscape. Join the movement of shared knowledge and creativity!
*For full license details, visit [Creative Commons](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).*
