Comparison of lung function and self-efficacy between Balinese dancer and non-dancer students in Denpasar, Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53638/phpma.2024.v12.i2.p02Keywords:
lung function, self-efficacy, dancers, respiratory, BaliAbstract
Background and purpose: Balinese dance is a well-known traditional activity which has been proven to have physiological and psychological benefits. This study aims to compare the differences in lung function and self-efficacy between Balinese dancer and non-dancer students in Denpasar, Bali.
Methods: This was an analytical observational study using a cross-sectional method, which was carried out directly at the Physiology Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University and Denpasar “X” Institute, from January to September 2023. Participants were students of the Dance and Visual Communication Design Study Programs of Denpasar “X” Institute who met the study criteria accounted for 48 students in each group. The data collection was conducted using a Chestgraph HI-101 spirometry for lung function measurement and a self-efficacy scale by I Made Rustika for self-efficacy measurement. The data was analyzed with SPSS 26 using T-independent and Mann-Whitney tests for mean comparison.
Results: The two groups have similar distribution of age, sex, weight, height and smoking status. The respiratory function indicators were higher in dancer group compare to non-dancer group, the mean difference of 0.34 (p=0.02) for FVC(L), 10.14 (p<0.001) for FVC%, 0.3 (p=0.04) for FEV1(L), and 0.77 (p=0.02) for FEV 25%. No significant difference in self-efficacy was observed.
Conclusion: The dancer students have higher lung function compare to non-dancer student. This signify dancing can become one form of physical activities that can be introduced to improve lung function since early age.
References
Wahyudiyanto. Pengetahuan tari [Dance knowledge]. Surakarta: ISI Press Solo; 2008.
Sustiawati NL, Arini AK, Suci NN, Armini NL, Sukasih NN. Pengetahuan seni tari Bali [Knowledge of Balinese dance art]. 1st ed. Denpasar: PT Empat Warna Komunikasi; 2011.
Delgado BJ, Bajaj T. Physiology, lung capacity [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541029/
Griadhi IP, Adiatmika IP, Tirtayasa IK. Traditional Lègong dance training is superior to moderate aerobic training on physical fitness improvement among young girls. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2021; 18(7): 826–831.
Fong Yan A, Cobley S, Chan C, Pappas E, Nicholson LL, Ward RE, et al. The effectiveness of dance interventions on physical health outcomes compared to other forms of physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2018; 48(4): 933–951.
Sabaananth S, Gopinath V, Thevanthy T. Effect of different dance training on vital capacity among post-pubescent girls. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2014; 1(1): 85.
Santosa WR, Gayatri PR. Pengaruh jenis kelamin dan masa kerja terhadap tingkat ventilasi [The influence of gender and working period on ventilation level]. Judika (Jurnal Nusantara Medika). 2020; 4(2): 126–131.
Mutakin M, Fauziati R, Fadhilah FN, Zuhrotun A, Amalia R, Hadisaputri YE. Pharmacological activities of soursop (Annona muricata Lin.). Molecules. 2022; 27(4): 1201.
Saraswati LD. Faktor yang mempengaruhi kapasitas vital paru lansia di Kelurahan Karanggeneng Kecamatan Boyolali Kabupaten Boyolali tahun 2010 [Factors affecting vital lung capacity among the elderly in Karanggeneng Subdistrict, Boyolali Regency, in 2010]. Kesmas Indonesia. 2017; 4(2): 137–149.
Rustika IM. Efikasi Diri: Tinjauan teori Albert Bandura [Self-efficacy: A theoretical review of Albert Bandura's theory]. Buletin Psikologi. 2016; 20(1–2): 18–25.
Peters M, Potter CM, Kelly L, Fitzpatrick R. Self-efficacy and health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study of primary care patients with multi-morbidity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2019; 17(1): 1-11.
Rahmah A, Gazi. The influence of self-efficacy and social support toward self-regulation on traditional dancers. JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia). 2017; 6(1): 1-10.
Dibia IW. Panca wi: Lima pedoman dasar tari Bali [Panca wi: five basic principles of Balinese dance]. 1st ed. Denpasar: Prasasti; 2022.
Linge AD, Bjørkly SK, Jensen C, Hasle B. Bandura’s self-efficacy model used to explore participants’ experiences of health, lifestyle, and work after attending a vocational rehabilitation program with lifestyle intervention – a focus group study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2021; 14: 3533-3548.
Bandura A. Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1997.
Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, Hallstrand TS, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update an official American thoracic society and European respiratory society technical statement. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2019; 200(8): E70–E88.
Berggren G, Christensen EH. Heart rate and body temperature as indices of metabolic rate during work. Arbeitsphysiologie. 1950; 14(3): 255–260.
Ekelund U, Poortvliet E, Yngve A, Hurtig-Wennlöf A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M. Heart rate as an indicator of the intensity of physical activity in human adolescents. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001; 85(3): 244–249.
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020; 54(24): 1451-1462.
Chastin SFM, De Craemer M, De Cocker K, Powell L, Van Cauwenberg J, Dall P, et al. How does light-intensity physical activity associate with adult cardiometabolic health and mortality? Systematic review with meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019; 53(6): 370–376.
Muliarta IM. Fisiologi sistem respirasi [Physiology of the respiratory system]. 1st ed. Denpasar: Swasta Nulus; 2019.
Rustika IM. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi akademik pada remaja [Factors influencing academic achievement in adolescents] [Dissertation]. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2014.
Karl KA, O’Leary-Kelly AM, Martocchio JJ. The impact of feedback and self-efficacy on performance in training. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1993; 14(4): 379–394.
Lopez-Nieves I, Jakobsche CE. Biomolecular effects of dance and dance/movement therapy: A review. American Journal of Dance Therapy. 2022; 44(2): 241–263.
Kaimal G, Ray K, Muniz J. Reduction of cortisol levels and participants’ responses following art making. Art Therapy. 2016; 33(2): 74–80.
Pratiwi AD, Sawitri DR. Prokrastinasi akademik ditinjau dari efikasi diri akademik dan lama studi pada mahasiswa jurusan Desain Komunikasi Visual Universitas Dian Nuswantoro [Academic procrastination based on academic self-efficacy and study duration in students of Visual Communication Design, Dian Nuswantoro University]. Jurnal Empati. 2015; 4(4): 272–276.
LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Sex differences in respiratory function. Breathe. 2018; 14(2): 131-140.
Liu P, Ye Z, Lu H, Lu J, Huang L, Gong J, et al. Association between body mass index (BMI) and vital capacity of college students of Zhuang nationality in China: A cross-section study. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(46): 80923.
Fadlilah S, Sucipto A, Aryanto E. Perbedaan kapasitas vital paru antara perokok dengan bukan perokok [Differences in lung vital capacity between smokers and non-smokers]. Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan Stikes Hang Tuah Surabaya. 2020; 15(1): 115–123.
Pitriamaryani T. Perbandingan kapasitas vital paru-paru siswa perokok dan tidak perokok di SMP Negeri 23 Padang [Comparison of lung vital capacity between smoking and non-smoking students at SMP Negeri 23 Padang]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Olahraga. 2019; 2(9): 10–14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ni Luh Putu Larasati Prabawaning Tyas, I Made Muliarta, Susy Purnawati, Luh Putu Ratna Sundari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
**Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)**
*Welcome to the world of open collaboration and shared creativity! The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) empowers creators to share their work with the world while maintaining certain rights.*
**Key Points:**
1. **Freedom to Share:** CC BY 4.0 allows creators to share their work globally, granting others the freedom to use, remix, and build upon it.
2. **Attribution Requirement:** Users can use the work for any purpose, even commercially, as long as they provide appropriate credit to the original creator.
3. **Flexibility:** Applicable to various content types—text, images, music, videos—the license fosters a diverse range of creations.
**Common Use Cases:**
- **Education:** Widely used for educational materials, promoting open learning environments.
- **Research:** Applied to scholarly articles, accelerating the dissemination of knowledge.
**How to Use:**
1. **Share:** Share your work with the world, marking it with the CC BY 4.0 license.
2. **Attribution:** Users, when utilizing the work, must provide proper attribution to honor the original creator.
**Conclusion:**
CC BY 4.0 contributes to a more open and collaborative digital landscape. Join the movement of shared knowledge and creativity!
*For full license details, visit [Creative Commons](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).*
