Risk Factors of Poor Glycaemic Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at the Primary Health Center of Kembiritan Banyuwangi Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53638/phpma.2015.v3.i1.p13Keywords:
risk factors, type 2 diabetes mellitus, poor glycaemic controlAbstract
Background and purpose: Number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Kembiritan Primary Health Center has increased as many as 160 in 2013 to 215 in 2014. This study was conducted to determine risk factors of poor glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Primary Health Center of Kembiritan Banyuwangi.
Methods: The research design was a case control study of 55 patients with poor glycaemic control of diabetes mellitus as cases and 55 patients with good glycaemic control of diabetes mellitus as controls (1:1), who were randomly selected from the registers of patients with diabetes mellitus at the primary health center during 2014. Data was collected through interviews at the primary health center during March-May 2015 using questionnaires. Data was analyzed by univariate, bivariate (chi square test) and multivariate using logistic regression.
Results: Bivariate analysis showed that duration of disease and nutritional status significantly increase risks of poor glycaemic control respectively with OR=2.9 (95%CI: 1.20-7.54) and OR=5.7 (95%CI: 1.82-21.04). Multivariate analysis showed four factors that increase the risk of poor glycaemic control, namely duration of disease with adjusted OR=3.8 (95% CI: 1.37 to 10.59), medication adherence, with adjusted OR=3.7 (95% CI : 1.30 to 10.59), nutritional status, with adjusted OR=6.6 (95%CI: 2.01-21.44) and distance of health facilities, with adjusted OR=3.1 (95%CI: 1.19-7.95).
Conclusion: Risk factors for poor glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were disease duration, adherence of medication, nutritional status and distance to health facilities.
References
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2015. The Journal of Clinical and Applied Research and Education. 2015. Vol. 38 Supplement 1.
World Health Organization. Technical Brief for Policy Maker. Geneva, Switzerland. 2008.
RISKESDAS. Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Kementrian Kesehatan RI; 2013.
Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Laporan Tahunan Seksi Penyakit Tidak Menular. Banyuwangi: Dinkes Kabupaten Banyuwangi; 2013.
Maulana M. Mengenal Diabetes: Panduan Praktis Mengenal Penyakit Kencing Manis. Jogjakarta: Katahati; 2008.
International Diabetes Federation. One Adult in Ten will Have Diabetes by 2030. 2011 Available from: URL: http://www.idf.org.
Kementrian Kesehatan. Deskripsi Kegiatan “Prevention and Control of Diabetes” di Kota Cilegon tahun 2010-2011. Jakarta; 2010.
PERKENI. Konsensus Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Indonesia. Jakarta: Perkumpulan Endokrinologi Indonesia; 2011.
Soewondo P, Soegondo S, Suastika K, Pranoto A, Soeatmadji D, Tjokroprawiro A. The DiabCare Asia 2008 Study-Outcomes on Control and Complication of Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Indonesia. Medical Journal of Indonesia. 2010; 4 (19):235-244.
Mafauzy M. Diabetes Control and Complications in Public Hospitals in Malaysia. Medical Journal of Malaysia. 2006: 4(61):477-483.
Nitiyanant W, Tandhanand S, Mahtab H, Zhu X, Pan C, Raheia B, Sathe S, Soegondo S, Soewondo S, Kim Y, Embong M, Lantion-Ang L, Lim M, Lee W, Wijesuriya M, Tai T, Chuang L, Le H, Cockram C, Jorgense L, Yoe J. The Diabcare-Asia 1998 Study-Outcomes on Control and Complications. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2002;18 (5); pp.317-327.
Ahmad SN, Islahudin F, Paraidathatu T. Factors Associated with Good Glycaemic Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Investigation. 2014; 5(5):563-569.
Chua S and Chan S. Medication Adherence and Achievement of Glycaemic Targets in Ambulatory Type 2Diabetic Patiens. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science.2011:01(04):55-59.
Imawati F. Hubungan Konsumsi Karbohidrat, Total Energi, Serat, Beban Glikemik dan Latihan Jasmani dengan Kadar Glukosa Darah pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2. Artikel Penelitian. Program Studi Gizi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2008. Available from: URL: http://www.undip.ac.id.
Astuti CM. Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pengendalian Kadar Glukosa Darah Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Rawat Jalan di Poliklinik Penyakit Dalam RSJ Prof. dr. Soerojo Magelang. Artikel Penelitian. Program Studi Gizi Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia; 2013. Available from: URL: http://lib.ui.ac.id.
Sanal T, Nair N., Adhikari P. Factor Associated with Poor Control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Journal of Diabetology. 2011 ;1-10.
Nainggolan O, Kristanto Y, Edison H. Determinan Diabetes Melitus Analisis Baseline Data Studi Kohort Penyakit Tidak Menular Bogor 2011. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2013; 3(16): 331-339. 18. Heilbronn L, Noakes M, Clifton P. The Effect of High-and Low-Glycaemic Index Energy Restricted Diets on Plasma Lipid and Glucose Profiles in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects with Varying Glycaemic Control. Journal of the American College of Nutrition.2002:21(2):120-127
Trisnawati SK dan Setyorogo S. Faktor Risiko Kejadian Diabetes Melitus Tipe II di Puskesmas Kecamatan Cengkareng Jakarta Barat. Jurnal Kesehatan. 2013; 5(1):6-11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rizki Yulia Purwitaningtyas, I Wayan Gede Artawan Eka Putra, Dewa Nyoman Wirawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
**Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)**
*Welcome to the world of open collaboration and shared creativity! The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) empowers creators to share their work with the world while maintaining certain rights.*
**Key Points:**
1. **Freedom to Share:** CC BY 4.0 allows creators to share their work globally, granting others the freedom to use, remix, and build upon it.
2. **Attribution Requirement:** Users can use the work for any purpose, even commercially, as long as they provide appropriate credit to the original creator.
3. **Flexibility:** Applicable to various content types—text, images, music, videos—the license fosters a diverse range of creations.
**Common Use Cases:**
- **Education:** Widely used for educational materials, promoting open learning environments.
- **Research:** Applied to scholarly articles, accelerating the dissemination of knowledge.
**How to Use:**
1. **Share:** Share your work with the world, marking it with the CC BY 4.0 license.
2. **Attribution:** Users, when utilizing the work, must provide proper attribution to honor the original creator.
**Conclusion:**
CC BY 4.0 contributes to a more open and collaborative digital landscape. Join the movement of shared knowledge and creativity!
*For full license details, visit [Creative Commons](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).*
